Skip to main content

Extension

Open Main MenuClose Main Menu

The Use of Early Weaning in Practical Cattle Management

Introduction

On a short-term basis, many cattlemen find themselves with cows or heifers that are too thin at breeding time to project inadequate rebreeding rates. Droughts, range fires or other natural disasters often leave cattlemen with emergency shortages of forage. Management solutions, even drastic ones that can salvage high pregnancy rates (and therefore, next year’s income) are important.


On a longer-term basis, the cattle industry faces severe price competition from poultry and pork. It is unlikely beef cattle will ever be able to compete on a price per pound of product basis with either, especially poultry. Of all the costs of producing beef, the largest single cost is that of investment cost in land for the cow herd, followed by costs for purchased feed and harvested forage. Therefore, management practices reducing nutrient requirements of the cow herd and offering the potential for more efficient utilization of pasture resources need to be evaluated by cattle producers.


Early weaning has been shown to be a possible solution for the short-term forage and reproduction during emergency situations. This practice may also offer some help in the longer-term economic problem if management of the early-weaned calf can be handled.

 

Early Weaning and Reproduction

The greatest constraints for limiting nutrient intake of beef cows are the necessity of maintaining good body condition for reproduction and increased requirements for milk production. Milk production effects requirements two ways: directly for production of milk, and indirectly in terms of increased maintenance requirements during lactation.


The adverse effects of suckling on reproduction of beef cows has been well researched. Work in the 1930s showed that Holsteins milked six times each day rebred more slowly than cows milked tow times or three times (see Table 1). Simulated twinning was produced by grafting an extra calf at birth on Hereford x Holstein cow at the Fort Reno Station (Wyatt et al., 1976). Cows were fed so weight and condition changes were the same for cows with twins and singles. Cows rearing twins produced 39 percent more milk, weaned 60 percent more calf, but were slower to start cycling after calving. At 80 days after calving, only 43 percent of cows with twins had cycled, compared with 71 percent for cows with singles. Cows rearing twin calves were nursed more frequently (4.7 vs 3.4 times daily) and 25 percent longer each day than cows with single calves.

 

Table 1. Reproduction, performance and nursing behavior of cows rearing single or simulated twin calves.

  Single calves Twin calves
Daily winter supplement1
post-calving, lb
3.9 6.8
Fall weight, lb 1092 1119
Winter weight loss, % 19 18.6
Daily milk yield, lb 14.5 20.2
Calving date 12-29-04 12-27-04
Cows cycling by 60 days post-partum, % 36 14
Cows cycling by 80 days post-partum, % 71 43

1 30% all-natural crude protein supplement.


The potential for using early weaning to salvage reproduction is illustrated by an OSU study (Table 2, Lusby and Wettemann, 1980). Calves from 31 spring-calving, 2-year-old first-calf heifers in very thin body condition (condition scores of 3 and 4) were weaned at six to eight weeks of age. Thirty additional heifers were assigned to raise their calves to the normal weaning age of seven months. Early weaned calves were moved to drylot and fed a complete ration made of corn, cottonseed hulls, and protein. At 4 1/2 months of age, half of the early-weaned calves were moved to native pasture with the drylot ration available in a creep feeder. Early weaning improved reproduction rates from 59 percent in heifers that raised their calves to normal weaning up to 97 percent for very thin heifers with early-weaned calves. Weaning weights were similar for drylot and normally weaned heifers (Table 3). However, calves moved to pasture with the drylot ration as a creep feed weighed less.

 

Table 2. Weight changes and conception rates of heifers with normal or early weaned calves.

  Suckled Early Weaned
Heifer weights 11/15/78 738 726
After calving, Feb, Mar, Apr, 1979 698 680
Weight gains changes    
calving to breeding -16 34
during breeding period
(5/29/79-7/31/79)
48 73
calving to weaning
(10/11/79)
90 195
Weight at weaning 788 875
Conception rates    
conceived/exposed 19/32 30/31
% pregnant 59.4 96.8

 

Table 3. Weight gains, weaning weights and feed efficiencies of normal and early weaned calves.

  Suckled Drylot Drylot-Pasture
Number of calves 30 16 13
Weight at early weaning, lb   124 126
Gain from 7/31/79-10/11/79   106 62
Weight at normal weaning age 373 374 330
Feed conversion (as fed basis)   4.67 4.78
Feed consumption (lb/hd/day)      
ration 1   2.5
ration 2   5.9 4.3
ration 3   11.5 6.5

A second trial looked at the effects of early weaning on reproduction of mature cows in moderate body condition (condition score = 5; Lusby and Parra, 1981). Half the calves from 48 Hereford cows were early weaned at six weeks to eight weeks of age, and the other half remained with their dams until normal weaning age. Early-weaned calves were raised to normal weaning age on the same ration used in the previous trial. Cows with early-weaned calves rebred faster after calving (46 days vs 81 days) and had higher conception rates (100 percent vs. 83 percent; Table 4). Early-weaned calves weighed more at normal weaning age than calves raised by their dams, and gains of early weaned calves were efficient.

 

Table 4. Effects of early weaning on cow performance and performance of normal reared and early weaned calves.

    Normal weaned Early weaned
Cow weight, lb      
  Time of early weaning    
  (Avg. date, May 19) 816 832
  End of breeding, July 7 922 968
  At weaning 920 1040
Condition scores      
  Time of early weaning 5.04 5.07
  End of breeding 5.69 6.29
  At weaning 5.99 6.82
Interval from calving to      
  first observed estrus, days 81 46
No. cows pregnant/exposed   19/23 (83%) 23/23(100%)
Calf weights, lb      
  At birth 71 68
  At early weaning 145 155
  At weaning, (205 day, steer equiv.) 347 435
Avg daily gain, early weaning to 205 days, (158 days)   1.27 1.77
Avg daily feed 8.84  
Lb feed/lb gain, Dry matter basis   4.5

Other studies have shown the response to early weaning may depend on body condition score of the cow. Bishop and Wettemann (1990) reported 100 percent of cows with condition scores greater than 5 had begun cycling within 25 days after their calves were early weaned at 45 days of age compared to only 43 percent of cows with condition scores of less than 5. Research has shown that body condition of the cow does influence the time between early weaning and the first postpartum estrous cycle. Cows in moderate to good condition generally cycle within 14 days after calves are weaned. Thinner cows will require more time.

 

Early Weaning and Forage Intake

A major expense in the production of weaned calves is the cost of forage and the land on which it is grown. Cost of forage can be even more critical during periods of drought when all feed for the cow herd must be purchased. Early weaning can be a good emergency tool during these times. An Illinois study showed that early weaned (110 days of age) fall-calving beef cow-calf pairs consumed 20 percent less total digestible nutrients, fed as hay, than normal weaned pairs. Additionally, the early weaned pairs were 43 percent more efficient in converting TDN to weight gain.


The following information is also discussed in ANSI-3031, Nutrition and Management Considerations for Preconditioning Home Raised Beef Cattle.

 

What to Do With the Calves

Although the benefits of early weaning on improving reproduction and reducing feed inputs to the cow have been recognized for many years, the factor limiting practical application of early weaning has been management of the early weaned calf. To date, the only programs for spring-born calves that permit “normal” rates of gain to typical normal weaning ages have been drylot programs. Young calves can be very efficient on high-concentrate rations and dry matter conversions of 4:1 are possible up to weights of about 500 lbs. However, feeding programs for young (two- to seven-month-olds) calves need to be “growing programs” that hold daily gains to levels similar to those achieved on the cow. These rates of gain will generally range in the 2.0 lb/day to 2.5 lb/day range, depending on frame size and growth potential of the calves. Otherwise, full-fed baby calves will get fat too early and will not finish at acceptable slaughter weights. Specialty programs, such as limit-feeding of high concentrate rations are attractive to facilities than can manage the programs because of the efficiency and low cost that can be attained.


An “early weaning ration” developed during the OSU studies is shown in Table 5. This is a very palatable ration that is readily consumed by young calves. Intake should be about 3 percent of body weight within seven days. Gains to normal weaning age will be in the 2.0 lb/day to 2.5 lb/day range. Of course, endless possibilities exist for such rations but this one has been very successful for early weaned calves and stressed light-weight stockers.

 

Table 5. Ration for receiving very light calves or early weaning.

Ingredient % in ration, as fed
Cottonseed hulls 14.7
Alfalfa pellets 15.1
Rolled corn 46
Cane molasses 4.7
Soybean meal 17.7
Calcium carbonate 1
Dicalcium phosphate 0.5
Salt 0.3
Vitamin A 2000 IU/lb
Vitamin E 20 IU/lb
Trace mineral Cu, Zn, Se as needed to meet NRC req.
Coccidiostat As per veterinarian’s preference
Ration Specs (DM basis)  
Dry matter, % 88.2
NEm, Mcal/100 lb 82
NEg, Mcal/100 lb 50
Crude Protein, % 16.7
Potassium, % 1.2
Calcium, % 0.95
Phosphorus, % 0.45

As a rule, cattle need to be moved to progressively increasing levels of energy as they move toward slaughter. Moving calves from a high rate of gain in drylot to native range, for example, will result in poor gains. Therefore, calves raised in drylot to normal weaning age on mixed rations need to be moved to nutritional programs with good gain potential after finishing the drylot growing phase. Calves raised to seven months of age in drylot probably need to be moved to a feedlot or a forage with the gain potential of wheat pasture.


Oklahoma has one forage system that may provide an answer for fall-calving programs needing to early wean, namely wheat pasture. In a preliminary trial at OSU, 55 calves born in September and October 1993, were weaned on December 14, held in drylot on prairie hay and 2 lbs of protein pellets, and moved to wheat pasture on December 29. Calves gained about 2 lbs/day on wheat through grazeout with no supplemental feed. Virtually all cows rebred with minimal supplement on native range. It offers the potential for reducing feed costs, increasing stocking rates on the native pasture, and doing this with minimal labor.

 

Managing Health of Early Weaned Calves

Spring-calving herds present a couple of problems that should not be serious concerns for fall-calving herds. First, there presently is no summer equivalent to wheat pasture for grazing of early weaned calves. Therefore, any early weaning program for spring-born calves will need to utilize some type of drylot feeding program. Growing programs for early weaned calves studied at OSU have involved full-fed rations (Lusby, et al, 1981; Gill et al., unpublished) and limited program-fed rations (Lusby, et al., 1991).


Minimal health problems have been observed with university and producer cattle demonstrations, when the calves were maintained on the home ranch. However, serious problems have been encountered when early weaned calves were moved directly from the cow to commercial feeding or growing facilities. There must be some kind of prior preparation phase before exposing young, early weaned calves to the stresses of shipment, weaning and the numerous pathogens circulating around a feedlot. The preparation phase will probably involve some concentrate feeding at the ranch of origin and a well-designed immunization program. More studies are needed to involve large numbers of calves from commercial ranches rather than small numbers of Experiment Station calves.


Vaccination programs for 2- to 4-month-old calves are obviously tricky and are left to the discretion of the attending veterinarian. Programs used to date have ranged from only clostridial vaccines at early weaning followed by virus and other vaccines at older ages to aggressive programs with the full gamut of vaccines at early weaning and repeated revaccinations.

 

Observations and Conclusions

  1. Early weaning is a fairly predictable method of salvaging high reproduction rates during droughts, management mistakes and other emergencies.
  2. The early weaned calves are pretty tough and learn to eat palatable rations quickly. Health problems when calves are weaned and kept on the ranch have been minimal. Stressful procedures like castration and dehorning should be performed well ahead of early weaning.
  3. If at all possible, early weaned calves should be managed on the ranch or managed with only a short haul for some period after weaning.
  4. Management of early weaned calves in commercial feedlots is risky and requires close coordination of the rancher, feedlot manager, nutritionist and veterinarian. Each must understand the program and all must cooperate. Mistakes have long-term and often fatal consequences.
  5. Wheat pasture offers the potential of high rates of gain for early weaned fall-born calves.
  6. There are not presently any forage-based programs for early weaned spring-born calves during the summer that permit gains equal to that on the cow. Crabgrass may offer promise but has not been researched. Research at OSU suggests that gains of about 1.5 lbs/day to 1.75 lbs/day can be achieved with 3 lbs/day or 4 lbs/day of supplemental feed and summer grass. While not a great rate of gain, it is economical and the calves probably would do very well on wheat in the fall.

 

Literature Cited

Lusby, K. S. and Donald R. Gill. 1994. Receiving and growing rations. Okla. Coop. Ext. Serv., E-900:7.


Lusby, K. S. and Angel A. Parra. 1981. Effects of early weaning on calf performance and on reproduction in mature cows. Okla. Agri. Exp. Stat. MP-108:64.


Lusby, K. S. and R.P. Wettemann. 1980. Effects of early weaning calves from first calf heifers on calf and heifer performance. Okla. Agri. Exp. Stat. MP-107:55.


Wyatt, R. D., R. P. Wettemann, M. B. Gould, Leon Knori, and Robert Totusek. 1976. Effect of single vs twin rearing on cow and calf performance. Okla. Agri. Exp. Sta. MP-96:43.

 

David Lalman
Extension Beef Cattle Specialist

Was this information helpful?
YESNO
Fact Sheet
Regenerative Agriculture: An Introduction and Overview

By David Lalman, Amanda De Oliveira Silva, Brian Arnall, Dana Zook, Jason Warren, Julia Laughlin, Kevin Wagner, Laura Goodman, Paul Beck and Lyndall Stout. Learn the definitions for the regenerative agriculture concept, describe foundational practices specific to Oklahoma agriculture, and discuss published and ongoing research related to these practices.

Backyard PoultryBeef CattleCropsForest Ecology, Management & CareForestryGrazing ManagementLivestockPoultryRangeland ManagementRegenerationSoilSoil Health & Fertility
Fact Sheet
Calf Preconditioning: A Comprehensive Overview

By Paul Vining, Paul Beck, Kellie Curry Raper, David Lalman, Blake Wilson, Rosslyn Biggs and Darrell Peel. Learn about health and economic benefits of beef calf preconditioning practices. "Preconditioning" in the beef industry involves management practices designed to bolster calf immunity and nutritional health while minimizing stress-related challenges during marketing and transport. Preconditioning prepares calves to manage subsequent stages of the beef supply chain, resulting in higher calf value due to reduced illness rates. These practices not only lower medical and labor costs associated with treating sick calves but also enhance overall economic viability within the beef industry.

Beef CattleCow-CalfLivestock
Fact Sheet
Western District Fires

Learn about the Western District Fires that occurred during the week of February 26, 2024, the damage valuation and recovery cost. By Amy Hagerman and Derrell Peel.

Fire EcologyWeather & Disaster PreparednessWildfire RecoveryWildfires
VIEW ALL
MENUCLOSE