Skip to main content


Open Main MenuClose Main Menu

Effect of Bos Indicus Influence and Pregnancy on Feeder Heifer Gains


Several factors influence performance of feeder cattle, including initial weight (hundredweight, cwt), breed, Bos indicusgenetics, and, for heifers, pregnancy status at placement. We recently completed a feeding trial with crossbred heifers at a commercial feedlot near Buffalo, Oklahoma. While the goal of the trial was to conduct a preliminary assessment of a feed additive, we were able to assess how Bos indicus influence and pregnancy at placement impacts average daily gain.



The study was conducted with 313 heifers, averaging 627 pounds at placement,at Buffalo Feeders, LLC. Heifers were fed an identical diet. At arrival, heifers were vaccinated, weighed, pregnancy checked using ultrasound and implanted. Seven heifers were pregnant 90 days or less and had their pregnancy terminated using lutalyse. Heifers pregnant more than 90 days were removed from the study. Heifers were assigned to one of eight pens based on a randomized block design. Heifers were re-implanted on day 81 and day 152. On day 152, heifers were sorted into pens based on weight class (heavy and light). Heavy-pen heifers were harvested on day 243 and light pen heifers were harvested on day 264. Summary statistics are shown in Table 1.


Table 1. Summary Statistics (n=310)

  Variable Frequency Percent
  Hide color    
  Black & Black/White 200 64.5
  White & Yellow 92 29.7
  Red & Red/White 18 5.8
  Breed makeup    
  Bos indicus* 271 87.4
  Bos taurus 39 12.6
  Pregnancy Status    
  Pregnant 7 2.3
  Open 303 97.7

*Bos indicus-influenced heifers (approximately 25% Bos indicus)


Methods and Results

Average daily gain models were estimated as a function of receiving hundredweight, hide color, Bos indicus influence and pregnancy status. Bos indicus-influenced heifers had significantly higher ADG during the first 80 days (ADG1). In the first period, Bos indicus-influenced heifers average daily gain was 0.28 pounds per day (p≤ 0.1) higher than the Bos taurus heifers. The difference in average daily gain was not significant in the last two time periods. Pregnant heifers had a 0.41-pound lower ADG (p≤0.05) than open heifers. Aborted heifers likely experienced trauma, stress and blood loss due to pregnancy termination. In periods two and three, formerly pregnant heifers’ average daily gain was not statistically different from open heifers. It is possible that they recovered from the pregnancy termination or had compensatory gain, or the number of observations of formerly pregnant heifers was too low to detect significance.



Pregnant heifers had a 0.4-pound lower average daily gain through the first 80 days but there was no significant difference in ADG in subsequent feeding periods, possibly due to a low number of pregnant heifers at placement. Bos indicus-influenced heifers had a higher average daily gain during the first 80 days compared to Bos taurus heifers. Since the data had too few pregnant heifers, the statistical models lacked the power to measure the full feeding period impact of pregnancy on average daily gain and profitability. Still there are reasons to be cautious of purchasing pregnant feeder heifers. Jim et at. (1991) report that open heifers earned $40 per head more than heifers that aborted calves in a feedlot setting. There are additional costs associated with feeding pregnant heifers, including veterinary and labor costs. Pregnant heifers that do not abort calves may calve in the feedlot, resulting in both added labor, death losses, reduced average daily gains and lower carcass values.


Jim, G. Kee, Carl S. Ribble, P. Timothy Guichon, and Ben E. Thorlakson. "The relative economics of feeding open, aborted, pregnant feedlot heifers." The Canadian Veterinary Journal 32, no. 10 (1991): 613.

Was this information helpful?
Fact Sheet
2024 Oklahoma Timber Price Report

By Ryan DeSantis. Learn about factors that affect stumpage prices, 2023-2024 price trends and the 2024 marketing outlook.

Business Planning & ManagementFarm & Ranch FinancesFinancial StatementsForestry
Fact Sheet
Nutritive Value of Feeds

By Paul Beck, David Lalman and Alexi Moehlenpah. To ensure their animal's diets are balanced nutritionally, producers must know available feed nutrient composition, physical and digestive characteristics and the animal's nutrient requirements.

Beef CattleLivestockLivestock Health, Disease & NutritionLivestock NutritionPastures & ForageSilage
Fact Sheet
From Cash Records to Cost of Production

By Rodney Jones, Courtney Bir, and Brent Ladd. This fact sheet guides producers through the steps to identify cash and noncash costs, allocate these costs to the appropriate enterprise, and calculate their cost of production.

Budgets & RecordkeepingBusiness Planning & ManagementFarm & Ranch Finances
Fact Sheet
The Economic Contribution of the Cotton Industry in Oklahoma

By Andrew J. Van Leuven, Jeff Vitale, Dayton M. Lambert, Phil Kenkel, Hannah E. Shear and Emily Norris. Learn about the cotton industry's value in the state of Oklahoma.

Business Strategy & MarketingCommunity & Rural ImprovementCottonCropsEconomic DevelopmentFarm & Ranch FinancesMarket Outlooks
Back To Top