Skip to main content

Extension

Open Main MenuClose Main Menu

Slaughterhouse Water Use and Wastewater Characteristics

Water use and wastewater characteristics are important factors to consider when designing a slaughterhouse and included operations. This fact sheet collects some of the data reported on slaughterhouse water use and wastewater characteristics for cattle, sheep and poultry. Engineers, planners and designers may use this information to help guide their important decisions on water supply, distribution, management and treatment involving slaughterhouses.

 

Contents of slaughterhouse wastewater vary widely from plant to plant, depending on many factors, including manufacturing and cleaning practices. The organic content of wastewater can be significantly reduced by incorporating good manufacturing processes (GMPs). For example, separation of blood, grease, solid particles and paunch contents from the wastewater stream will help significantly (Stover, 1974).

 

Table 1 gives approximate potable water use in slaughterhouse operations for cattle, swine and poultry. Tables 2, 3 and 4 list wastewater characteristics measured from slaughterhouses processing cattle, swine and poultry, respectively. Information in all tables is arranged alphabetically by source.

 

Table 1. Potable water use in slaughter operations.

Source Cattle Swine Poultry
5m, 2009   45 gal/animal  
Gil & Allende, 2018 150 to 450 gal/animal   3.5 to 10 gal/animal
Matsumura & Mierzwa, 2008     3.0 to 4.5 gal/animal
Park et al., 2012   15.3 to 320 gal/cwt  
Salminen, 2002 317 to 343 gal/animal 44 to 186 gal/animal 4.7 to 4.9 gal/animal
Ziara, 2015 355 gal/1,000 lbs. body weight    

 

Table 2. Cattle slaughterhouse wastewater characteristics reported by researchers.

Source Animals slaughtered BOD mg/l COD mg/l TSS mg/l Oils mg/l pH
Cassidy & Belia, 2005 Cattle, Canada   7,685 ± 646 1,742 ± 116   7.3 ± .4
Husam & Nassar, 2019 Cattle, Gaza 2,350 4,502     7.1
Maroneze et al., 2014 Cattle, Brazil   7,693 ± 5,193 540 ± 212   7.0 ± 0.2
McCabe et al., 2013 Cattle, Queensland 163 to 7,020 1,040 to 12,100   5-2,110  
Musa et al., 2019 Cattle 17,158 ± 95 32,000 ±1 12 22,300 ± 212 1,024 ±212 6.9 ± 0.8
Salminen, 2002 Cattle, Finland 3,100 to 4,100        
Um et al., 2016 Cattle, France 2,570 ±11 1,860 ± 72 5,800 ± 14   7.6
United States Environmental  Cattle, first processing,           
     Protection Agency, 2004 rendering, U.S. 7,237   1,153    
United States Environmental  Cattle, first processing,           
      Protection Agency, 2004 rendering, hides, U.S. 3,673 to 6,404   1,510 to 3,332    
Wu & Mittal, 2012 Cattle, Canada 14,545 ± 5,802 50,665 ± 83,866   2,427 ± 3,386 7.0 ± 0.4
Wu & Mittal, 2012 Swine, Canada 4,711 ± 2,356 10,010 ± 6,188   1,521 ± 4,160 7.0 ± 0.6
Ziara et al., 2018 Cattle, U.S. mid-size 1,486 ± 831 4,185 ± 2,141 4,973 ± 2,526 269 ±196 7.9 ± 0.9
Ziara et al., 2018 Cattle, U.S. large-size 1,090 ± 314 2,758 ± 856 2,767 ± 510 106 ±153 7.4 ± 1.1

 

Table 3. Swine slaughterhouse wastewater characteristics reported by researchers.

Source Animals slaughtered BOD mg/l COD mg/l TSS mg/l Oils mg/l pH
Bui, 2018 Swine, Vietnam   4,150 ± 30 176 ± 23   6.53 ± .15
Ha & Huong, 2017 Swine, Vietnam   3,200 to 5,100     6.1 to 7.0
João et al., 2020 Swine, Brazil 3,018 4,380 1,000 100  
Masse & Masse, 2001 Swine, Canada   2,333 to 8,627     4.9 to 7.2
Oliveira et al., 2017 Swine, Brazil 2,429 ± 2,180 7,176 ± 4,631     7.8 ± 0.3
Park et al., 2012 Swine, USA (Iowa) 5,732 ± 1,522 7,864 ± 4,294 2,355 ± 1,321   5.64 ± 0.26
Salminen, 2002 Swine, Finland 340 to 980        
Villarroel Hipp &             
     Silva Rodriguez, 2018 Swine, Chile   9,610   18,625  
Wu & Mittal, 2012 Swine, Canada 4,711 ± 2,356 10,010 ± 6,188   1,521 ± 4,160 7.0 ± 0.6

 

Table 4. Poultry slaughterhouse wastewater characteristics reported by researchers.

Source Animals slaughtered BOD mg/l COD mg/l TSS mg/l Oils mg/l pH
Aziz et al., 2018 Poultry, Malaysia 573 to 1,177 777 to 1,825 395 to 783 2,362 to 3,616 6.3 to 6.9
Bazrafshan et al., 2012 Poultry, Iran 2,543 ± 362 5,817 ± 473 3,247 ± 845 34 ± 9 7.31 ± 0.12
Delforno et al., 2017 Poultry, Brazil   1,790 to 4,760 2,133 114 to 640  
Meiramkulova et al. 2020. Poultry, Kazakhstan 653 2,042 116   7.4
Pierson & Pavlostathis, 2000 Poultry, U.S.   2,319 2,000   6.7
Rajakumar et al., 2011 Poultry, India 750 to 1,890 3,000 to 4,800 300 to 950 800 to 1,385 7 to 7.6
Ramdani et al., 2019 Poultry, Indonesia   676 to 770      
Salminen, 2002 Poultry, Finland 730        
Septiana et al., 2019 Poultry, Indonesia 3,216 6,406      
Wu & Mittal, 2012 Poultry, Canada 1,648 ± 859 3,321 ± 2,234   ND 7.0 ± 0.3

 

Definition of terms

  • BOD – Biological Oxygen Demand – the amount of oxygen consumed by microorganisms during the decomposition of organic matter.
  • COD – Chemical Oxygen Demand – the amount of oxygen equivalents consumed through the chemical oxidation of organic matter.
  • TSS – Total Suspended Solids – particles larger than 2 microns.

 

Conclusion

Design of a slaughterhouse facility can be a challenging process including many  unknowns, estimates and guesses. Making informed choices on design parameters, like water use requirements and wastewater characteristics, will help improve project  success. This fact sheet provides a summary of water use and wastewater  characteristics collected and reported by reliable references. Contact  fapc@okstate.edu for assistance or additional information.

 

References

  • 5m. (2009). Environmental Issues Control Slaughter Production. The Pig Site. Retrieved 12/23 from thepigsite.com/articles/environmental-issues-control-slaughter-production
  • Aziz, H. A., Puat, N. N. A., Alazaiza, M. Y. D., & Hung, Y. T. (2018). Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater Treatment Using Submerged Fibers in an Attached Growth Sequential Batch Reactor. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15081734
  • Bazrafshan, E., Mostafapour, F. K., Farzadkia, M., Ownagh, K. A., & Mahvi, A. H. (2012). Slaughterhouse wastewater treatment by combined chemical coagulation and electrocoagulation process. PloS ONE, 7(6), e40108. 
  • Bui, H. M. (2018). Applying Response Surface Methodology to Optimize the Treatment of Swine Slaughterhouse Wastewater by Electrocoagulation. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 27(5).
  • Cassidy, D. P., & Belia, E. (2005). Nitrogen and phosphorus removal from an abattoir wastewater in a SBR with aerobic granular sludge. Water Research, 39(19), 4817-4823. doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.09.025 
  • Delforno, T. P., Lacerda Junior, G. V., Noronha, M. F., Sakamoto, I. K., Varesche, M. B. A., & Oliveira, V. M. (2017). Microbial diversity of a full-scale UASB reactor applied to poultry slaughterhouse wastewater treatment: integration of 16S rRNA gene amplicon and shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Microbiologyopen, 6(3). doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.443
  • Gil, M. I., & Allende, A. (2018). Water and wastewater use in the fresh produce industry: food safety and environmental implications. In Quantitative Methods for Food Safety and Quality in the Vegetable Industry (pp. 59-76). Springer
  • Ha, B. M., & Huong, D. T. G. (2017). Coagulation for treatment of swine slaughterhouse wastewater.
  • Husam, A.N., & Nassar, A. (2019). Slaughterhouses Waste-water Characteristics in the Gaza Strip. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 11(07), 844. 
  • João, J. J., Silva, C. S. d., Vieira, J. L., & Silveira, M. F. d. (2020). Treatment of swine wastewater using the Fenton process with ultrasound and recycled iron. Revista Ambiente & Água, 15(3).
  • Maroneze, M. M., Barin, J. S., Menezes, C. R. d., Queiroz, M. I., Zepka, L. Q., & Jacob-Lopes, E. (2014). Treatment of cattle-slaughterhouse wastewater and the reuse of sludge for biodiesel production by microalgal heterotrophic bioreactors. Scientia Agricola, 71(6), 521-524. 
  • Masse, D. I., & Masse, L. (2001). The effect of temperature on slaughterhouse wastewater treatment in anaerobic sequencing batch reactors. Bioresource Technology, 76(2), 91-98. 
  • Matsumura, E., & Mierzwa, J. (2008). Water conservation and reuse in poultry processing plant—A case study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52(6), 835-842.
  • McCabe, B., Harris, P., Baillie, C., Pittaway, P., & Yusaf, T. (2013). Assessing a new approach to covered anaerobic pond design in the treatment of abattoir wastewater. Australian Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Engineering, 10(1), 81-93. 
  • Musa, M. A., Idrus, S., Che Man, H., & Nik Daud, N. N. (2019). Performance comparison of conventional and modified upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors treating high-strength cattle slaughterhouse wastewater. Water, 11(4), 806.
  • Oliveira, J. F. d., Rodrigues, F. N., Fia, R., Mafra, D. C., & Lan-dim, D. V. (2017). Percolate quality in soil cultivated with application of wastewater from swine slaughterhouse and dairy products. Engenharia Agrícola, 37(6), 1222-1235. 
  • Park, J., Oh, J. H., & Ellis, T. G. (2012). Evaluation of an on-site pilot static granular bed reactor (SGBR) for the treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng, 35(3), 459-468. doi.org/10.1007/s00449-011-0585-0 
  • Pierson, J. A., & Pavlostathis, S. G. (2000). Real-Time Monitoring and Control of Sequencing Batch Reactors for Secondary Treatment of a Poultry Processing Wastewater. Water Environment Research, 72(5), 585-592. 
  • Rajakumar, R., Meenambal, T., Banu, J. R., & Yeom, I. (2011). Treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater in upflow anaerobic filter under low upflow velocity. International 
    Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 8(1), 149-158.
  • Ramdani, F., Prasetya, A., & Purnomo, C. (2019). Removal of pollutants from chicken slaughterhouse wastewater us-ing constructed wetland system. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,
  • Salminen, E. (2002). Finnish expert report on best available techniques in slaughterhouses and installations for the disposal or recycling of animal carcasses and animal waste. 
  • Septiana, I., Siami, L., Tazkiaturrizki, T., Hadisoebroto, R., & Ratnaningsih, R. (2019). Analysis of load variation on chicken slaughterhouse waste water treatment using GAS-SBR. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,
  • Stover, E. L. (1974). Studies on the Performance of Biological Nitrification Processes for the Removal of Nitrogenous Oxygen Demand from Wastewaters Oklahoma State University]. 
  • Um, M. M., Barraud, O., Kérourédan, M., Gaschet, M., Stalder, T., Oswald, E., Dagot, C., Ploy, M.-C., Brugère, H., & Bib-bal, D. (2016). Comparison of the incidence of pathogenic and antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli strains in adult cattle and veal calf slaughterhouse effluents highlighted different risks for public health. Water Research, 88, 30-38. 
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency, E. a. A. D. (2004). Technical Development Document for the Final Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Meat and Poultry Products Point Source Category (40 CFR 432) (EPA-821-R-04-011). epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-1
  • Villarroel Hipp, M. P., & Silva Rodriguez, D. (2018). Bioremediation of piggery slaughterhouse wastewater using the 
    marine protist, Thraustochytrium kinney VAL-B1. J Adv Res, 12, 21-26. doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2018.01.010
  • Wu, P. F., & Mittal, G. S. (2012). Characterization of provincially inspected slaughterhouse wastewater in Ontario, Canada. 
    Canadian Biosystems Engineering, 54. 
  • Ziara, R. (2015). Water and Energy Use and Wastewater Production in a Beef Packing Plant. 
  • Ziara, R. M. M., Li, S., Subbiah, J., & Dvorak, B. I. (2018). Characterization of Wastewater in Two U.S. Cattle Slaughterhouses. Water Environment Research, 90(9), 851-863. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143017X1513101218797

 

Timothy Bowser

Food Process Engineer

 

Jacob Nelson

Value-Added Meat Processing Specialist

Was this information helpful?
YESNO
Fact Sheet
Effects of Lead Ammunition and Sinkers on Wildlife

By Dwayne Elmore, Don Wolfe, Kevin Allen. Learn about the effects of lead ammunition and sinkers on wildlife.

BirdsHuntingPollution, Hazardous Materials, & ContaminationRaptorsWaterWildlife
Fact Sheet
Gray Water Reuse

By Sergio M. Abit Jr. Learn about the reutilization of gray water and its positive impact on households.

Municipalities & Infrastructure WaterWaste Water ManagementWater
Fact Sheet
Inspection of Septic Systems

By Sergio M. Abit and Larry Boyanton. Learn about the basic functions of septic systems and how to improve the septic system evaluation process as a homeowner.

Home Care & SafetyHome SafetyMunicipalities & Infrastructure WaterSeptic Systems & SewageWaste ManagementWaste Water ManagementWater
Fact Sheet
Aflatoxins in Wildlife Feed: Know How to Protect Wildlife

A guide for understanding alfatoxins, the affects that they have when in the feed and reducing the risk of aflatoxin exposure to wildlife.

CropsPollution, Hazardous Materials, & ContaminationWaterWildlife
VIEW ALL
MENUCLOSE