Skip to main content

Extension

Open Main MenuClose Main Menu

Managing Alfalfa Weevil Insecticide Resistance

For alfalfa producers, damage by alfalfa weevil threatens both short- and long-term economic goals. Defoliation, reduced yield and quality are immediate concerns. In addition, loss of yield in the current crop, inhibition of growth in subsequent cuttings, increased susceptibility to disease and early weed encroachment can further decrease stand life.

 

Insecticide resistance has become a major issue in many alfalfa producing states. Field research trials and laboratory bioassays in Oklahoma have indicated varying degrees of alfalfa weevil resistance to conventional pyrethroid insecticides, especially those containing lambda-cyhalothrin.

 

Several products are available in Oklahoma for alfalfa weevil control; however, modes of action are limited (Table 1).

 

Development of new insecticide products and increasing costs in testing and regulation of these products make it essential to preserve and extend the life of each mode of action through Integrated Resistance Management programs. Understanding the principles of resistance management is crucial in helping growers and certified crop advisors pro-actively manage alfalfa weevil populations.

 

The number of compounds screened by the chemical industry just to find and commercialize one product continues to escalate (Figure 1). These issues, along with the ever-present threat of resistance, make developing Integrated Resistance Management programs even more challenging.

 

Graph of the research and development costs

 

Figure 1. Research and development costs associated with bringing new products to market. Adapted from Sparks, Pesticide Biochem. Phys. (Pier et al, 2015). 

 

An Integrated Approach to Integrated Resistance Management

The most effective plan to combat alfalfa weevil insec­ticide resistance is to incorporate as many strategies as feasible to prevent it from occurring. When working toward this goal, incorporation of an Integrated Resistance Manage­ment program in conjunction with a comprehensive Integrated Pest Management approach is recommended. This type of system covers three basic components: monitoring pest complexes in the field for changes in population survival, focusing on economic thresholds and integrating multiple control strategies.

Name and Group # Active Ingredient Example Products

Sodium channel Modulators Pyrethroids (3A)

Lambda-cyhalothrin

Cyfluthrin

Permethrin

Gamma-cyhalothrin

Zeta-cypermethrin

 

Warrior (Many generics e.g., Silencer, Paradigm, Grizzly).

Baythroid

Pounce

Proaxis

Mustang-Max

Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) Inhibitors

Carbamates and (1A&B)

Methomyl (1A)

Carbaryl (1A)

Malathion (1B)

Lannate

Sevin

Malathion

Voltage-dependant sodium channel blockers (22)

Indoxacarb

Steward

Table 1: Major chemistries listed for alfalfa weevil control in Oklahoma.

 

Monitoring

Scouting is a fundamental strategy for any Integrated Pest Management program. Insect identification and deter­mination of population density are crucial for a successful integrated plan. Research-based sampling procedures are used to determine if pesticides are justified and necessary.

 

Economic Thresholds

Insecticides should be used only if insects are nu­merous enough they begin to approach economic losses exceeding the cost of the insecticide plus application (economic threshold). Producers are encouraged to consult their local advisors or Oklahoma State University Exten­sion specialist about economic thresholds of target pests in their areas.

 

Integrated Control Strategies

Alfalfa growers and crop consultants should incorpo­rate as many Integrated Pest Management strategies as possible including the effects of beneficial insects, cultural controls, pest-resistant varieties, mechanical approaches, and insecticides when needed.

  • Applications of insecticides must be timed correctly and target the most vulnerable life stages of insect pests and the crop. Scouting is a must. It is critical that producers follow spray rates and application intervals recommended by manufacturers label and in compli­ance with local agricultural regulations. Scouting is a must.
  • It is important to mix and apply insecticides accurately.
  • A key element of effective resistance management is the use of insecticide rotations or sequences of dif­ferent insecticide mode of action classes. By rotating insecticide mode of action within the same crop cycle or year after year, producers can
  • It is important to consider the impact of pesticides on beneficial insects and use products at labeled rates and spray intervals to minimize undesired effects on parasitoids and predators that attack a wide range of potential pests
  • Another management option is preservation of susceptible population of pests. Some programs try to preserve susceptible individuals within the target population by providing a refuge for susceptible insects. These susceptible individuals may out-compete and interbreed with resistant individuals, which dilutes the impact of any resistance that may have been selected.
  • Consider crop residue options. Late-season harvesting or grazing (after a hard freeze) can deprive alfalfa weevils of overwintering egg deposition sites and reduce spring weevil occurrence. 

With continued importance of insecticides as a control measure, alfalfa weevil insecticide resistance will continue to occur. Utilizing an integrated resistance management plan allows growers to be proactive in delaying and managing resistance.

 

For additional information:

Was this information helpful?
YESNO
Fact Sheet
Fall Forage Production and First Hollow Stem Date for Wheat Varieties During the 2023-2024 Crop Year

By Amanda de Oliveira Silva, Tyler Lynch, Israel Molina Cyrineu, Samson Abiola Olaniyi, Cassidy Stowers, Ephraim Muyombo, Lettie Crabtree. Learn about fall forage production and first hollow stem date in small grain varieties during the 2023-2024 crop year.

CropsForageGrains & OilseedsPastures & ForageWheat
Fact Sheet
Dual Use Wheat and Risk Management Alternatives for Oklahoma Cattle Producers

This factsheet outlines the policy rules and potential benefits of insurance fit into risk management for agricultural producers due to rising input costs, weather fluctuations, and legal risks.

Beef CattleCropsGrains & OilseedsLivestockStocker CattleWheat
Fact Sheet
Warm Season Perennial Forage and Hay Quality Result Summary (2019-2024)

By Brian Arnall. Learn about the forage quality results from samples sent the OSU Soil Water Forage Analytical Laboratory. These values can help producers gauge that status of their forage systems, to determine if premiums maybe possible, or if management is needed to improve the quality.

ForagePastures & Forage
VIEW ALL
MENUCLOSE