Skip to main content

Extension

Open Main MenuClose Main Menu

Fall Forage Production and First Hollow Stem Date for Wheat Varieties During the 2024-2025 Crop Year

Introduction

Fall forage production potential is one of the major considerations in deciding which variety to plant. Dual-purpose wheat producers may find varietal characteristics, such as grain yield after grazing and disease resistance, to be more important selection criteria than an advantage in early forage production potential. Forage-only producers might place more importance on planting an awnless wheat variety or one that germinates readily in hot soil conditions. Ultimately, fall forage production is a selection criterion that should be considered. For more information on variety characteristics, refer to OSU Fact Sheet PSS-2142 Wheat Variety Comparison Chart.

 

Fall forage production potential is determined by genetics, management and environmental factors. The purpose of this publication is to quantify some of the genetic differences in wheat forage production potential and grazing duration among the most popular varieties grown in Oklahoma. Management factors, such as planting date, seeding rate and soil fertility, are very influential and sometimes more important than variety selection in determining forage production. Environmental factors, such as rainfall amount and distribution and temperature, also play a large role in dictating how much fall forage is produced. All these factors, along with yield potential after grazing and the individual producer’s preferences, will determine which variety is best suited for a particular field.

 

 

Site Descriptions and Methods

The objective of the fall forage variety trials is to give producers an idea of the fall forage production ability of wheat varieties commonly grown throughout Oklahoma. The forage trials were conducted under Oklahoma State University’s Small Grains Variety Performance Trials. During the 2024–2025 growing season, forage trials were conducted at the Chickasha and Stillwater test sites. Additionally, first hollow stem measurements were collected at both sites in 2025. Weather data for each location are provided in Figures 1 and 2.

 

This graph has the "Average Daily Temperature (°F)" from 0 to 100 on the left and the "rainfall (in)" from 0 to 3.5 on the right. The dates from October 1st to March 30th on the bottom. From Stillwater Oklahoma.

 

Figure 1. Average daily temperature (line graph) and rainfall (bar chart) from Oct. 1, 2024 to March 31, 2025, at Stillwater. Weather data courtesy Oklahoma Mesonet.

 

 

This graph has the "Average Daily Temperature (°F)" from 0 to 100 on the left and the "rainfall (in)" from 0 to 3.5 on the right. The dates from October 1st to March 30th on the bottom. From Chickasha Oklahoma.

 

Figure 2. Average daily temperature (line graph) and rainfall (bar chart) from Oct. 1, 2024 to March 31, 2025, at Chickasha. Weather data courtesy Oklahoma Mesonet.

 

 

A randomized complete block design with four replications was used at each site. Plots at each location were established in a conventionally tilled seedbed. At planting, 5 gallons per acre of 10-34-0 was applied in seed furrow at Stillwater and Chickasha. Due to severe drought conditions at planting, 0.5 inches of irrigation were applied on Oct. 7, 8, 9 and 17 in Stillwater to support seed germination and emergence. The seeding rate at both locations was 120 pounds per acre. Forage was measured by hand clipping two, 1-m by 1-row samples approximately ½ inch above the soil surface from the interior rows within each plot. There was only one forage sampling date at each location (Table 1). All samples were placed in a forced air dryer after collection for approximately seven days and weighed. Fertility, planting date and forage sampling date information is provided in Table 1.

 

Table 1. The locations, planting and forage sampling dates, and pre-plant soil test information of the trials.
Location  Planting date Sampling date  pH nitrate-N
(lbs/ac)
STP STK
Chickasha 10/02/2024 12/10/2024 7.5 113 52 308
Stillwater 10/11/2024 12/09/2024 5.3 30 69 270

Notes: STP: soil test P index; STK: soil test K index

 

 

The Stillwater trial included both ungrazed and simulated grazed plots, while the Chickasha trial consisted of ungrazed plots only. In the simulated grazing treatment, plants were mowed to a height of 2.5 inches on Jan. 3, 15 and 28 as well as Feb. 10 and 28 and March 6 and 12. First hollow stem sampling began at the end of January at both locations and was conducted every three to four days by variety until all varieties reached first hollow stem. Plant samples were collected for each variety by digging an 8-inch section of row and selecting 10 plants randomly from this sample. The largest tiller on each plant was split longitudinally, and the hollow stem below the developing grain head was measured. Varieties were considered to be at first hollow stem when the average measurement of the 10 plant samples was 1.5 cm (5/8 inch) or greater. For more information on first hollow stem, refer to OSU Fact Sheet PSS-2147 First Hollow Stem: A Critical Wheat Growth Stage for Dual-Purpose Producers.

 

 

Results

As indicated in Figures 1 and 2, the 2024–2025 fall forage production season was marked by moderate temperatures and extremely low rainfall. The irrigation applied shortly after planting helped with crop establishment and enabled the crop to take advantage of the rainfall that arrived later in October. This contributed to the moderate level of fall forage production observed in our fields in Stillwater. The average fall forage production at Stillwater was 1,473 lbs/acre, and values ranged from 984 to 2,070 lbs/acre (Table 2). Average forage production at Chickasha was 2,175 lbs/acre, and values ranged from 1,734 to 2,609 lbs/acre (Table 3).

 

Table 2. Fall forage production for the winter wheat varieties at Stillwater during the 2024–2025 production year and two, three, and four-year averages.
Licensee Variety 2024
lbs dry forage/acre
2-Year
lbs dry forage/acre
3-Year
lbs dry forage/acre
4-Year
lbs dry forage/acre
OGI Paradox 2070 2918 2111 2369
OGI High Cotton 1924 2586 - -
KWA KS Providence 1784 2523 - -
PlainsGold Kivari AX 1723 3023 - -
OGI Scab Stryker 1695 2438 - -
OGI Orange Blossom CL+ 1683 1844 - -
Croplan CP7462 1638 - - -
PlainsGold Sheridan 1631 - - -
Westbred WB4347 1602 - - -
Westbred WB4445CLP 1572      
OGI Showdown 1564 2356 1702 1999
AgriPro AP Sunbird 1452 - - -
AgriPro AP24 AX 1725 1564 - -
OGI Green Hammer 1411 2518 1793 2154
Westbred WB4422 1370 1924 - -
LCS LCS Cowie AX 1364 - - -
Croplan CP7017AX 1334 - - -
Armor AR Turret 25 1330 - - -
AGSECO AG Radical 1261 1669 1281 1717
Westbred WB4792 1227 2172 1578 2033
OGI OK Corral 1163 2471 1752 2158
OGI Strad CL Plus 1097 2003 1405 1870
Armor AR Iron Eagle 22AX 1036 - - -
Croplan CP7869 984 - - -
OSU Experimentals
OK21DTR1705-91
1655 - - -
OSU Experimentals
OK23D89076X
1405 - - -
OSU Experimentals
OK20708
1378 1415 - -
           
  Mean 1473 2228 1660 2043
  LSD (0.05) 457 720 414 344

Notes: Bolded values are not statistically different from the highest-yielding variety within a column. Em-dashes "—" = data not available.

 

 

Table 3. Fall forage production for the winter wheat varieties at Chickasha during the 2024–2025 production year and two and three-year averages.
Licensee Variety 2024
lbs dry forage/acre
2-Year
lbs dry forage/acre
3-Year
lbs dry forage/acre
OGI High Cotton 2609 1773 -
PlainsGold Kivari AX 2409 1757 -
OGI Paradox 2399 - -
Westbred WB4347 2364 - -
Armor AR Iron Eagle 22AX 2363 - -
Westbred WB4445CLP 2333 - -
OGI OK Corral 2309 1819 1415
OGI Green Hammer 2284 1628 1256
LCS LCS Cowie AX 2243 - -
PlainsGold Sheridan 2241 - -
OGI Strad CL Plus 2224 1520 1141
Croplan CP7462 2186 - -
Armor AR Turred 25 2179 - -
OGI Orange Blossom CL+ 2175 - -
AgriPro AP Sunbird 2170 - -
AGSECO AG Radical 2140 1550 -
AgriPro AP24 AX 2124 - -
OGI Scab Stryker 2102 - -
Westbred WB4422 2078 - -
Croplan CP7017AX 2019 - -
Westbred WB4792 1932 - -
OGI Showdown 1908 1377 1095
KWA KS Providence 1840 1324 -
Croplan CP7869 1734 - -
OSU Experimentals
OK20708
2377 - -
OSU Experimentals
OK20708
2091 - -
OSU Experimentals
OK23D89076X
1904 - -
         
  Mean  2175 1594 1227
  LSD (0.05) 471 396 307

Notes: Bolded values are not statistically different from the highest-yielding variety within a column. NS; no statistical differences were detected among varieties within a column. Em-dashes "—" = data not available.

 

 

First hollow stem data are reported in day of year (day) format for the winter wheat varieties in Table 4. To provide a reference, keep in mind that March 1 is day 60. The fall and winter months were characterized by dry conditions in Stillwater with temperatures somewhat normal. Supplemental irrigation helped crops to emerge by mid-October (later than usual, but earlier than many places under drought in the state) and resulted in good plant development. The average winter wheat first hollow stem date at Stillwater ungrazed plots was day 77 (March 18). This was 29 days later than 2024 (Feb 17), eight days later than 2023 (March 10) and 12 days later than the 20-year average (March 6). There was a 18-day difference between the earliest and latest varieties at Stillwater compared to a 21-day difference in 2024 and 14-day difference in 2023. The average winter wheat first hollow stem date for the Chickasha location was 72 (March 13). This was 14 days later than 2024, one day later than 2023 (March 12) and seven days later than the 20-year average (March 6). There was a 14-day difference between the earliest and latest varieties at this location compared to a 13-day difference in 2024 and 11-day difference in 2023.

 

Table 4. Occurrence of first hollow stem (day of year) for the winter wheat varieties sown in 2024 and measured in 2025 at Stillwater and Chickasha.
Licensee Variety Stillwater
Non-Grazed
day of year
Grazed
day of year
Chickasha
Non-Grazed
day of year

PlainsGold Sheridan 83  86 76
OGI Strad CL Plus 79 83 72
OGI Paradox 79 83 72
Armor AR Turret 25 79 83 72
Croplan CP7869 79 83 72
LCS LCS Cowie AX 79 83 72
Westbred WB4445CLP 79 86 72
OGI OK Corral 76 86 76
OGI Green Hammer 76 86 76
OGI Showdown 76 83 76
OGI High Cotton 76 83 72
OGI Scab Stryker 76 86 69
Armor AR Iron Eagle 22AX 76 83 72
Croplan CP7017AX 76 83 72
Croplan CP7462 76 83 76
KWA KS Providence 76 83 72
Westbred WB4422 76 83 69
Westbred WB4792 76 90 72
OGI Orange Blossom CL+ 76 90 72
AgriPro AP24 AX 72 83 65
AgriPro AP Sunbird 72 83 72
AGSECO AG Radical 72 83 65
Westbred WB4347 72 83 69
AgriPro Kivari AX 65 83 62
OSU Experimentals
OK20708
83 86 76
OSU Experimentals
OK21DTR1705-91
79 86 72
OSU Experimentals
OK23D89076X
72 83 65
  Average 77 84  72

 

 

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Oklahoma Wheat Commission and the Oklahoma Wheat Research Foundation for providing partial funding for this research as well as to undergraduate students Lettie Crabtree, Camila Bayer and Francisco H. Aispuro Arana for their assistance with forage sampling collection and first hollow stem measurements.

 

Seed Sources and Abbreviations

  • AgriPro = AgriPro|Syngenta Seeds
  • AGSECO = AGSECO Inc.
  • KWA = Kansas Wheat Alliance
  • LCS = Limagrain Cereal Seeds
  • OGI = Oklahoma Genetics Inc.
  • OSU = Oklahoma State University
  • PlainsGold = PlainsGold Seeds
  • WestBred = WestBred Wheat
Was this information helpful?
YESNO
Fact Sheet
How Storage Time and Harvest Season Impact the Success of Planting Bermudagrass and Zoysiagrass Sod

By Mingying Xiang. Learn more about storage time during harvest season, how it impacts the success of planting bermudagrass and zoysiagrass sod, the materials and methods used, internal temperatures and general recommendations for sod producers and consumers.

CropsGrains & OilseedsHarvesting & Storage of Grains
Fact Sheet
Variation in Heat-Sensitive Germination Among Contemporary Hard Winter Wheat Varieties, 2019–2024

The role soil temperature plays in wheat germination and how that effects the plants growth process.

CropsGrains & OilseedsWheat
Fact Sheet
Hydroponics

By Bruce Dunn. An explanation on what hydroponics is, instructions for how to construct a system and guidelines on how to maintain a growing garden.

CropsGardening & Lawn CareGreenhouses & Indoor GardeningHydroponicsOrganic & Sustainable
Fact Sheet
Management of Soybean Inoculum

By Brian Arnall and Josh Lofton. Learn about soybean inoculum, how to manage, the impact of environmental conditions in inoculum management and their symbiotic relationship between the soybean plant and the rhizobium bacteria.

CropsGrains & OilseedsSoybeans
VIEW ALL
MENUCLOSE