Skip to main content

Extension

Open Main MenuClose Main Menu

Plant Health Update, October 2025

The month of October 2025 was relatively busy for PDIDL diagnosticians. We received samples from pecan orchards and additional detections of pecan bunchy top disease were confirmed. This was mentioned in a previous newsletter article (EPP-25-16) which was published in May 2025. Symptoms of this disease include a proliferation of dense, bushy stunted shoots (Figure 1). Usman Rabiu Bello will officially report this disease in the future. He is a current PhD student in the Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology.

 

A pecan tree with dense, bushy limbs.

Figure 1. Dense, bushy, stunted shoots are present on this pecan tree due to pecan bunchy top disease. Image provided by Usman Rabiu Bello.

 

Another new find affecting specialty crops was found in a plant sample submitted by Bronika Thapa, a M.S. student in the Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture. Bronika is researching roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa), a plant that is utilized in drinks, jams, sauces and teas and for medicinal purposes. She noted unusual leaf puckering, mottling and purple blotches on some of her roselle plants (Figure 2). PDIDL diagnosticians tested the leaves for viruses previously reported on this host, and all results were negative. Additional tests were run for other viruses known to occur in Oklahoma or affect related hosts such as hollyhock (Althaea rosea). Our lab found the roselle leaves to be infected with Tobacco ringspot virus using both serological and molecular testing methods. Additional leaf samples were collected and transferred to Dr. Francisco Ochoa Corona, a professor at the Institute for Biosecurity and Microbial Forensics and the Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology. Students in his lab will further investigate this detection and future publication is likely.

 

A pecan leaf with five points.

Figure 2a. Normal roselle leaf.

 

A pecan leaf with lumps and wilted edges.

Figure 2b.

 

Figure 2. Normal roselle leaf (A) as compared with abnormal leaf (B). The abnormal leaf has symptoms of puckering, purple blotches, and mottling. Images provided by Bronika Thapa.

 

A new aggressive strain of a fungus called Neopestalotiopsis sp. (abbreviated Neo-p) was reported a few years ago affecting strawberry plants, mainly in the southeastern United States. In October 2025, the PDIDL received samples from a commercial strawberry producer in Oklahoma with this problem. The PDIDL confirmed that Neo-p was affecting the strawberry plants and consulted with diagnosticians in other states about identifying the lineage (strain). Recently, researchers have identified two aggressive lineages of this fungus. Oklahoma isolates of the fungus have tested negative for lineage 1. We are collaborating with researchers at Clemson University to have the Oklahoma isolates tested for lineage 2. We hope to provide an update on the final diagnosis in a future Plant Health Update.

 

Leaf spots are usually the first symptom that develops when plants are affected by Neopestalotiopsis disease of strawberry. As the disease progresses, the fungus moves into the crown of the plant. Infected plants may be stunted, exhibit wilting and in time, may die. Fruit infection can also occur, resulting in sunken lesions, often dotted with black spore masses. North Carolina State University has excellent photos of the disease.

 

The symptoms of Neopestalotiopsis disease are easily confused with other common strawberry diseases including Phomopsis leaf spot, Gnomonia leaf spot, and others. Samples should be submitted to the PDIDL for confirmation of the exact problem. Visit your local county extension office for information about submitting samples to the lab.  

 

The most effective management practice to prevent Neopestalotiopsis disease is to purchase disease-free strawberry plants. However, the disease has become widespread, and it may be difficult to find disease-free plants. When purchasing new plants, it is suggested to place them in a quarantine area (away from other strawberry plants). Monitor them for a few weeks to verify they do not have symptoms that suggest Neopestalotiopsis disease (or other diseases) are present.

 

Other best management practices to reduce Neopestalotiopsis disease (and other strawberry diseases) are to avoid working around strawberry plants when they are wet. If individual plants develop symptoms, remove and destroy them (including crown, roots and some associated soil) before the symptoms spread to nearby plants. When possible, use drip or soaker hoses to irrigate plants to reduce splashing water that favors disease spread. Maintain proper plant spacing and remove weeds so strawberry plants have good airflow that promotes maximum leaf drying. If a strawberry planting is removed, do not replant strawberries in the site for at least 3 years. Other types of plants (non-hosts) may be planted on the site.  At this time, resistant strawberry cultivars have not been identified.

 

There are no fungicides specifically registered for managing this disease. However, some fungicides registered for other strawberry problems can suppress Neopestalotiopsis disease. Commercial strawberry producers in other states have found Thiram SC (active ingredient thiram), Switch 62.5 WG (syprodinil + fludioxonil), Rhyme (flutriafol) and Tilt (propiconazole) are helpful at suppressing the disease. For home gardeners, products containing captan and myclobutanil are suggested. There are not many chemical options for organic growers currently. Copper containing fungicides are one option, but may not be that effective. When applying pesticides, always follow the label!

 

A summary of all submissions in October to the PDIDL by Oklahoma specialty crop growers is provided in Table 1. Look for additional plant health updates from the PDIDL in the next few weeks for our remaining 2025 submissions. If you have suggestions for future topics, please contact jen.olson@okstate.edu or call the PDIDL at 405-744-9961.

 

Table 1. Summary of samples and diagnostic results for October 2025 from Oklahoma Specialty Crop Growers.
Number Host County DD M S C N MD DS RS O Diagnosis/Identification
1 Bermudagrass Cleveland X                 Environmental problems
2 Bermudagrass Cleveland X                 Unidentified mushrooms
3 Cedar, Eastern Red Cherokee   X   X   X X     Environmental or cultural problem
4 Choke Cherry Oklahoma   X   X   X X     Canker (Camillea tinctor)
5 Cottonwood Beaver X                 Rust
6 Cypress, Alaska Oklahoma   X   X           Environmental stress
7 Cypress, Arizone Canadian X                 Girdling root suspected
8 Elm, American Oklahoma   X   X   X X     Hypoxylon/Biscogniauxia canker
9 Elm, Chinese (Lacebark) Cleveland X                 Root rot suspected
10 Fothergilla Cherokee   X   X   X X     Rhizoctonia and Cylindrocladium root rots
11 Fruit tree Beckham X                 Jerusalem cricket (Ammopelmatus sp.)
12 Garden Texas X                 Great crested grasshopper (Tropidolphus formosus)
13 Garden N/A   X               Russet mites
14 Gomphrena Oklahoma   X       X X     Tospovirus detected
15 Hornbeam, European Tulsa   X   X   X x     Canker (Diplodia seriata)
16 Iron plant N/A X                 Armored scales
17 Landscape Tulsa X                 Hammerhead worm
18 Lilac Cherokee   X   X   X X     Cutting rot (Phytophthora palmivora, Rhizoctonia)
19 Limber pine Blaine X                 Nantucket pine tip moth suspected
20 Linden Tulsa   X               Cercospora leaf spot
21 Maple Kay X X       X       Root damage or problems
22 Maple. Silver Garfield X                 Leaf scorch
23 Maple, Silver Oklahoma X                 White grub (Family Scarabaeidae)
24 Marigold Oklahoma   X       X X     No tospovirus detected
25 Oak Tulsa   X   X   X X     Powdery mildew
26 Oak Tulsa   X   X   X X     Honey mushroom fungus (Armillaria tabescens)
27 Oak Payne                   Hypoxylon/Biscogniauxia canker
28 Oak Cleveland   X               Antracnose
29 Oak Cleveland   X               Fusiform rust
30 Oak Cleveland   X               Environmental stress
31 Oak Cleveland   X               Environmental stress
32 Oak Cleveland   X               Spider mites, Lacebug damage
33 Oak Cleveland   X               Fusiform rust
34 Oak Cleveland   X               Fusiform rust
35 Oak Cleveland   X               Chewing damage, possibly lacebugs
36 Oak Cleveland   X               Immature insects, possibly leaf hopper nymphs
37 Oak Cleveland   X               Powdery mildew
38 Oak Cleveland   X               Fusiform rust
39 Oak, Bur Cleveland X                 Oak lace bugs
40 Oak, Bur Cleveland X                 Wound canker
41 Oak, Bur Cleveland X                 Fungal leaf spot suspected
42 Oak, Bur Cleveland X                 Oak lace bugs
43 Oak, Bur Cleveland X                 Oak lace bugs
44 Oak, Bur Cleveland X                 Hail damage and antracnose suspected
45 Oak, Bur Cleveland X                 Fungal leaf spot suspected
46 Oak, Bur Cleveland X                 Feeding damage from arthropods
47 Oak, Bur Cleveland X                 Undetermined injury
48 Oak, Pin Canadian   X   X   X X     Hypoxylon canker, Leaf spot
49 Oak, Pin Mayes X                 Roundheaded wood borers
50 Oak, Post Tulsa X                 Shelf fungus (Pseudoinonotus dryadeus)
51 Oak, Sawtooth Grady X                 Basal trunk decay
52 Oak, Willow Kay X                 Environmental stress, Lichens
53 Okra Ottawa X                 Insect damage suspected
54 Pear, ornamental Payne   X       X       Leaf scorch (abiotic)
55 Pecan Grant X                 Fall webworm
56 Pecan Cleveland X                 Pecan weevil
57 Pecan Pawnee   X       X X     Pecan bunchy top detected
58 Pecan Pawnee   X       X X     Pecan bunchy top detected
59 Pecan Pawnee   X       X X     Pecan bunchy top not detected
60 Pecan Pawnee   X       X X     Pecan bunchy top not detected
61 Pecan Pawnee   X       X X     Pecan bunchy top detected
62 Pecan Pawnee   X       X X     Pecan bunchy top detected
63 Pecan Pawnee   X       X X     Pecan bunchy top not detected
64 Pecan Pawnee   X       X X     Pecan bunchy top not detected
65 Pecan Pawnee   X       X X     Pecan bunchy top detected
66 Pecan Pawnee   X       X X     Pecan bunchy top detected
67 Pepper, anaheim Payne   X       X       No tospovirus detected
68 Pepper, habanero Payne   X       X X     No tospovirus detected
69 Pine Pontotoc   X     X         Pine wilt not detected
70 Pine Oklahoma X                 Seasonal needle drop
71 Pine Pontotoc   X     X         Pine wilt not detected
72 Pine Oklahoma X                 Horntail wasp (Sirex sp.)
73 Pistache, Chinese Oklahoma X                 Branch dieback (unidentified cause)
74 Pistache, Chinese Cleveland X                 Environmental stress
75 Plant identification Choctaw   X           X   Carpetgrass (Axonupousi sp./spp.)
76 Red oak Stephens X                 Wound canker
77 Redbud, Eastern Pontotoc   X       X       Bacterial leaf scorch (Xylella fastidiosa)
78 Redbud, Eastern Payne X                 Burl, wound canker
79 Rose Oklahoma   X       X       Thrips and spider mites present
80 Rose Cleveland   X               Rose rosette not found
81 Roselle Payne   X X       X     Tobacco ringspot virus
82 Roselle Payne   X   X     X     Stem canker and root rot (Phytophthora nicotianae)
83 Salvia Oklahoma   X X     X X     Virus suspected
84 Sedum Washita X                 Root problem, possibly Rhizoctonia
85 Spruce, Blue Tulsa   X               Sudden needle drop (Setomelanomma holmiiI)
86 Spruce, Blue Marshall   X               Sudden needle drop (Setomelanomma holmiiI)
87 Strawberry Tulsa   X   X   X X X   Neopestatalotiopsis
88 Strawberry Tulsa   X   X   X X X   Neopestatalotiopsis
89 Sumac Canadian   X               Sumac speckled lanternfly
90 Sycamore Pontotoc   X       X       Leaf folder caterpillar (family Tortricidae)
91 Tomatillo Payne   X X     X X     Tobacco ringspot virus
92 Tomato Payne   X X     X X     Phytoplasma disease
93 Tomato McClain X                 Fruit rot/Anthracnose (Colletotrichum sp.) suspected
94 Tree Okfuskee   X       X X     Southern clam shell (Fomes fasciatus)
95 Tree Okfuskee X                 Root problems
96 Turfgrass Logan X                 Fall armyworms (Spodoptera frugiperda)
97 Turfgrass Payne   X               Vagabond sod webworm
98 Zinnia Cleveland   X               Tospovirus suspected
99 Zinnia Oklahoma   X       X       No Tospovirus detected
100 Zinnia Oklahoma   X               Tospovirus suspected
101 Zinnia Oklahoma   X       X X     Tospovirus detected
102 Zinnia Logan   X               Tospovirus suspected
103 Zinnia Payne   X       X       Thrips damage

KEY for Diagnostic Testing Methods

  • DD - Digital Diagnosis
  • M - Microscopy
  • S - Serological tests
  • C - Culture analysis
  • N - Nematode analysis
  • MD - Molecular diagnostic methods
  • DS - DNA sequencing
  • RS - Referral to specialist
  • O - Other diagnostic tests

No results to display

VIEW ALL
MENUCLOSE