Skip to main content

Extension

2020 Oklahoma Replicated Agronomic Cotton Evaluation (RACE) Trial Report

2020 Season Overview

Planting conditions were generally favorable for producers in 2020, although rain events in May delayed planting on a large proportion of acreage to late May and early June. In fact, the southwest and west-central locations of our 2020 RACE trials were all planted between May 29th and June 3rd. Moisture was rapidly diminishing by the end of the first week of June and hot, dry conditions dominated the primary cotton regions of the state through the remainder of the month and persisted into early July. Various significant rain events were received from mid-July into early August, although there were variations on how much and when rain fell across certain areas. For example, while the Oklahoma Mesonet site located in Elk City recorded 3.4 inches of rain during July, stations in Tipton and Altus each recorded 1.4 inches. However, this was reversed in August, with only 0.85 inches of rain received at Elk City (over half occurring during the last three days of the month), compared to 2.1 inches at both Altus and Tipton. This July through August rain was beneficial for both dryland and irrigated cotton. It coincided with the squaring through early/peak bloom growth stages for the majority of cotton in Oklahoma, which helped to reduce water stress during these critical growth stages and optimize yield.

There was an overall favorable outlook as the crop entered September, although the dry August had certainly lowered the optimism once surrounding the dryland crop. Then a cold snap struck western Oklahoma Sept. 9 and 10, with daytime highs struggling to reach 60 F at best, and nighttime lows flirting with freezing in many areas. Although this two-day cold snap was followed by a return to warmer temperatures, it is likely partially to blame for the struggles many had with defoliation and boll opening later in the year. It is more likely this short-term cold snap was an extreme sample of a larger issue, a cooler-than-average September with total heat unit accumulation falling 100 to 150 below average. It is likely the slower leaf drop and boll opening, as well as the variability in micronaire or low micronaire common to many areas in 2020 is to blame on the weather conditions the crop experienced throughout September. There was one final hurdle to cross as an ice storm struck the area in late October, coating open bolls in ice and resulting in lint stringing out of the bolls. Luckily, there was little wind with this system or in subsequent weather events, and the actual loss of lint due to fallout was surprisingly low given the severity of the storm and the number of open bolls present on the plants. The overall feeling from 2020 was that while both yields and quality were good, maybe even great in some cases, they generally fell short of expectations due to the favorable conditions throughout the first three months of the season. 

A total of 25 commercial varieties and one experimental variety from five seed companies were evaluated across five locations in the 2020 RACE Trials (Table 1). There were a multitude of insect and herbicide traits represented within these varieties, including both two and three gene Bt and herbicide traits (Table 2). Seasonal temperature patterns from the southwest and Panhandle regions are illustrated by the monthly heat unit accumulation for 2020 compared to the 12-year average for Altus (Figure 1) and Goodwell (Figure 2). Dryland performance pooled across the southwest region dry-land trials is presented in Table 3, while variety performance compared to the trial average of entries were included in at least four locations is presented in Table 4. Since there are variations in variety entries across the various regions of the state, these tables provide a hint of variety performance stability for areas unrepresented by our current RACE trial locations.

Table 1. Seed company participants and variety abbreviations for entries in 2019 Oklahoma RACE Trials.

 
Seed CompanyVariety EntriesAbbreviation
Deltapine® 1646 B2XF  DP 1646 B2XF
 1820 B3XFDP 1820 B3XF
 1822 XFDP 1822 XF
 1948 B3XFDP 1948 B3XF
 2012 B3XFDP 2012 B3XF
 2020 B3XFDP 2020 B3XF
 2038 B3XFDP 2038 B3XF
 2044 B3XFDP 2044 B3XF
Dyna-Gro®3317 B3XFDG 3317 B3XF
 3385 B2XFDG 3385 B2XF
FiberMax®1621 GLFM 1621 GL
 2398 GLTPFM 2398 GLTP
NexGen®2982 B3XFNG 2982 B3XF
 3729 B2XFNG 3729 B2XF
 3930 B3XFNG 3930 B3XF
 4098 B3XFNG 4098 B3XF
 4936 B3XFNG 4936 B3XF
 5711 B3XFNG 5711 B3XF
PhytoGen®350 W3FEPHY 350 W3FE
 400 W3FEPHY 400 W3FE
 480 W3FEPHY 480 W3FE
Stoneville®4990 B3XFST 4990 B3XF
 5600 B2XFST 5600 B2XF
 5610 B3XFST 5610 B3XF
 5707 B2XFST 5610 B3XF

Table 2. Insect and herbicide trait glossary for 2019 Oklahoma RACE Trial entries.

 
Insect TraitAbbreviationBt Proteins
Bollgard II®B2Cry1Ac + Cry2Ab
Bollgard 3®B3Cry1Ac + Cry2Ab + Vip3A
TwinLink®TCry1Ab + Cry2Ae
TwinLink Plus®TPCry1Ab + Cry2Ae + Vip3Aa19
Widestrike 3®W3Cry1Ac + Cry1F + Vip3A
   
Herbicide TraitAbbreviationHerbicide Tolerances
FlexEnlist®FEGlyphosate + Glufosinate + 2,4-D
GlyTol LibertyLink®GLGlyphosate + Glufosinate
XtendFlex®XFGlyphosate + Glufosinate + Dicamba

Acknowledgments

First and foremost, the authors would like to thank the Oklahoma cotton producers who serve as cooperators and allow us to use their land, equipment and time to conduct these trials. These trials wouldn’t be possible without their cooperation and support. Financial support for these trials was provided by the Cotton Inc. Oklahoma State Support Committee and the participating seed companies. We would like to thank Khawar Arain, Brendan Kelly and the staff of the Texas Tech University Fiber and Biopolymer Research Institute for providing fiber classing services for these trials. Finally, we would like to thank the Oklahoma Cotton Council for their support of both the cotton agronomy program at Oklahoma State University and the entire Oklahoma cotton industry.

Participating Seed Companies

  • Americot/NexGen
  • Deltapine
  • Dyna-Gro Seed
  • FiberMax/Stoneville
  • PhytoGen Cottonseed

For more information, visit OSU's Cotton section or NTOK Cotton.
 Monthly heat unit accumulation from the Altus Mesonet station.
Figure 1. Monthly heat unit (DD 60) accumulation from the Altus Mesonet station.
 Monthly heat unit accumulation from the Goodwell Mesonet station.
Figure 2. Monthly heat unit (DD 60) accumulation from the Goodwell Mesonet station.

Table 3. 2020 Southwest Dryland Pooled RACE Trial Results.

 
VarietyAverage Lint Yield1
lbs./acre 
Yield Deviation2
NG 4098 B3XF877     a+9.5%
ST 5600 B2XF837     a+3.0%
NG 3930 B3XF835     a+3.8%
ST 5707 B2XF826     a+1.8%
DP 1646 B2XF823     a+1.0%
DP 1948 B3XF802     ab-1.1%
NG 5711 B3XF738     b-10.1%
NG 4936 B3XF732     b-10.9%

1 Varieties included across Greer, Jackson and Tillman trial locations.
2 Percent difference between yield of variety and trial yield aver-age across all three locations.

Table 4. 2020 Variety Yield Deviation1 (minimum four locations).

 
Variety Greer Dry Jackson Dry Jackson Irr.Lincoln Dry Texas Dry Texas Irr.Tillman Dry Tillman Irr.Washita Dry Average
NG 4098 B3XF+7.46%+2.37%-2.87%+8.55%  +13.88%-1.58%+19.63%+6.78%
NG 3930 B3XF+2.67%-1.10% +3.46%+4.60%+2.56%+6.58%+2.30%+2.34%+2.93%
DP 1948 B3XF-1.15%-1.52%+9.86%   -0.87%+5.07% +2.28%
ST 5707 B2XF+0.30%+1.54%-4.71%-3.61%1.04% +3.38%+4.34%+2.50%+0.34%
ST 5600 B2XF+3.88%+3.95%+4.73% -25.55% +1.86%-5.72%+8.32%-1.22%
NG 5711 B3XF-4.0%-3.87%+1.52%   -18.25%+0.27%-1.42%-4.29%
DP 2020 B3XF  -9.38%-1.86% -10.52%+7.29%1.32%-16.29%-5.34%
NG 4936 B3XF-9.51%-4.90%-8.17%-12.27%  -14.21%-3.37% 12.56%-9.28%
DP 2012 B3XF   -0.52%-14.10%-12.86%  -11.71%-9.80%

Table 5. 2020 Greer Co. Dryland RACE Trial results.

Planted: May 29
Seeding Rate: 25,000 40-inch row spacing
Harvested: Nov. 7, stripper harvested

 
Variety Lint Yield (lbs./acre)
Turnout (%)
MicronaireLength (inches)Strength (g/tex)Uniformity (%) Loan Value1
(cents/lb.)
Return per Acre2
($/acre)
NG 4098 B3XF851 a34.40 a4.19 bc1.15 b32.9 b82.1 b-d54.10413
ST 5600 B2XF823 ab33.79 ab4.23 b1.10 de32.4 b81.8 cd53.63399
NG 3930 B3XF813 ab34.54 a4.89 a1.09 e27.3 d82.0  cd51.30378
ST 5610 B3XF809 ab34.77  a4.08 bc1.11 d30.5 c81.9  cd53.98394
DP 1646 B2XF798 ab33.74 a-c3.83  bc1.16 b29.9 c81.4  d52.25371
ST 5707 B2XF794 ab32.30 bc4.72  a1.13 cd34.5 a82.7  a-c53.25390
DP 1948 B3XF783 a-c31.98 b-d3.79 c1.20 a34.2  a83.8  a54.32383
ST 4990 B3XF771 bc31.79 cd4.02 bc1.11 de30.0 c81.6  cd54.03374
NG 5711 B3XF760 bc32.10 b-d3.85 bc1.12 cd30.9 c82.0  cd53.52364
NG 4936 B3XF717 c30.23 d4.00 bc1.14 bc29.9 c83.3  ab54.13345
         
Average79232.964.161.1331.382.353.45381
p-value0.04510.00180.0003<0.0001<0.00010.01580.43990.2758
pLSD69 1.98 0.43 0.031.2 1.3 NS3NS
CV 7.825.3210.193.221.327.573.089.51

1Color and leaf grades set to base levels (41 and 4, respectively) due to lack of proper lint cleaner on gin.
2Return per acre calculated as (lint yield per acre X loan value per pound) - seed cost per acre.
3NS; no significant statistical difference between varieties at p-value <0.1.

Table 6. 2020 Jackson Co. Dryland Strip Trial Results.
Planted: June 3
Seeding Rate: 20,000, 40-inch row spacing
Harvested: Nov. 19, stripper harvested

 
VarietyLint Yield (lbs. per acre) Turnout (%) MicronaireLength (inches) Strength (g/tex)  Uniformity  (%) Loan Value1  (cents/lb.)  
Return per Acre2
($/acre)
ST 5600 B2XF80235.874.721.1332.082.553.85398
DP 1646 B2XF79938.484.731.1628.682.354.55400
NG 4098 B3XF79034.894.031.1531.881.254.10389
ST 5707 B2XF78433.264.751.1634.083.455.15405
NG 3930 B3XF76336.834.891.0826.883.953.35375
DP 1948 B3XF76033.104.011.1632.382.454.10377
NG 5711 B3XF74233.413.961.1229.981.156.00381
NG 4936 B3XF73432.824.791.1530.084.056.45380
         
Average77234.834.491.1430.782.654.69388

1Color and leaf grades set to base levels (41 and 4, respectively) due to lack of proper lint cleaner on gin.
2Return per acre calculated as (lint yield per acre X loan value per pound) - seed cost per acre.

Table 7. 2020 Jackson Co. irrigated RACE trial results.
Planted: May 29
Seeding Rate: 42,000 38-inch row spacing
Irrigation: sub-surface drip located on 72” spacing in furrow
Harvested: Nov. 12, picker harvested

 
VarietyLint Yield (lbs. per acre) Turnout (%) MicronaireLength (inches) Strength (g/tex)
Uniformity (%) Loan Value1 (cents/lb.)  
Return per Acre2
($/acre)
DP 1948 B3XF1,882 a40.75 a-c4.091.29 a31.6 bc 84.1  a54.35951 a
PHY 400 W3FE1,814 ab41.34 ab4.281.20 cd31.9 b83.4 a-d54.55915 ab
DP 2038 B3XF*1,796 a-c42.50 a4.321.14 e30.3 cd82.3  d54.65912 ab
ST 5600 B2XF1,794 a-c41.35 ab4.851.22 b-d31.0 b-d83.5 a-d54.65908 ab
PHY 480 W3FE1,782 a-c38.45 b-d3.971.19 d30.2 cd83.7 a-c53.32877 a-c
NG 5711 B3XF1,739 a-d40.35 a-c3.991.23 bc30.9 b-d82.6 b-d53.07851 a-c
PHY 350 W3FE1,714 a-e38.89 b-d4.261.20 cd31.1 b-d82.9 a-d54.75866 a-c
NG 4098 B3XF1,663 b-e36.45 d3.811.29 a35.2 a82.5 cd52.10786  c
ST 5707 B2XF1,632 c-e36.40 d4.201.22 b-d34.5 a84.0 a54.93840  bc
FM 2398 GLTP1,612 se41.14 ab4.671.22 b-d31.3 b-d83.8 ab53.65795  c
NG 4936 B3XF1,573 se37.77 cd4.181.24 b29.9 d83.7 a-c54.77789  c
DP 2020 B3XF1,552 e35.96 cd3.901.23 bc30.3 cd83.1 a-d54.85776  c
         
Average1,71339.284.211.2231.583.354.14856
p-value0.0070.0010.1013<0.0001<0.00010.09120.63020.0261
pLSD168 3.06 NS3 0.03 1.4 1.3 NS 107
CV7.656.7611.383.485.621.033.099.11

Table 8. 2020 Lincoln Co. Dryland RACE Trial.
Planted: May 5
Seeding Rate: 34,000 38-inch row spacing
Harvested: Nov. 8, picker harvested

 
VarietyLint Yield (lbs./acre)  Turnout (%) Micronaire Length  (inches) Strength (g/tex) Uniformity (%)Loan Value1 (cents/lb.) 
Return per Acre2
($/acre) 
NG 4098 B3XF1,22340.923.831.2035.782.554.28599
PHY 350 W3FE1,19739.833.271.1533.082.048.58523
PHY 480 W3FE1,18940.643.861.1231.682.054.05584
PHY 400 W3FE1,18442.223.631.1231.481.453.85578
NG 3930 B3XF1,16640.353.481.1831.883.351.92552
DP 2012 B3XF1,12141.263.711.1733.282.654.20547
DP 2020 B3XF1,10640.713.641.1731.282.354.48541
ST 5707 B2XF1,08639.874.041.1835.882.654.23543
FM 1621 GL1,00744.064.721.1334.582.154.00505
NG 4936 B3XF98840.293.821.1330.582.253.95475
         
Average1,12741.023.801.1632.982.453.35545

1Four replications planted of each variety, approximately two plots were combined into a single round module producing two modules from each variety.
2Color and leaf grades set to base levels (41 and 4, respectively) due to lack of proper lint cleaner on gin.
3Return per acre calculated as (lint yield per acre X loan value per pound) - seed cost per acre.

Table 9. 2020 Texas Co. Dryland RACE Trial.
Planted: May 14
Seeding Rate: 35,000 30-inch row spacing
Harvested: Nov. 5, stripper harvested without bur extractor

 
VarietyLint Yield (lbs. per acre) Turnout (%) MicronaireLength (inches) Strength (g/tex)
Uniformity (%) Loan Value1  (cents/lb.)
Return per Acre2
($/acre)
DG 3317 B3XF420 a28.29 ab2.95 a1.04 c26.7 bc79.740.75 a110 a
DP 1822 XF413 a 28.92 a3.01 a1.12 a28.3 ab81.446.43 a145 a
DG 3385 B2XF406 ab28.17 ab3.16 a1.05 bc26.3 bc80.843.97 a118 a
NG 3930 B3XF387 ab 27.03 a-c2.93 ab1.08 a-c27.1 bc81.344.00 a114 a
NG 3729 B2XF 379 ab  25.78 a-c2.94 a1.09 ab27.6 ab80.144.45 a114 a
ST 5707 B2XF366 ab25.43 a-c2.81 ab1.09 a-c29.9 a80.141.97 a106 a
NG 2982 B3XF365 a-c24.71 bc2.25 c1.05 bc27.7 ab80.132.38 b49 b
DP 2012 B3XF318 bc23.27 c2.48 bc1.06 bc25.1 c79.532.60 b42 b
ST 5600 B2XF275 c24.01 c2.95 a1.06 bc28.3 ab80.240.37 a53 b
         
Average37026.182.831.0727.580.440.7795
p-value0.06050.05080.01540.07550.02270.35160.00160.0018
pLSD90 3.78 0.46 0.05 2.3 NS3 6.37 47
CV16.9210.2112.543.416.291.3014.2744.26

1Color and leaf grades set to base levels (41 and 4, respectively) due to lack of proper lint cleaner on gin.

2Return per acre calculated as (lint yield per acre X loan value per pound) - seed cost per acre.
3NS; no significant statistical difference between varieties at p-value <0.1.

Table 10. 2020 Texas Co. Irrigated RACE Trial.
Planted: May 12
Seeding Rate: 50,000 30-inch row spacing
Irrigation: lateral move overhead system
Harvested: Nov. 9, stripper harvested

 
VarietyLint Yield (lbs./acre)  Turnout (%)  Micronaire Length (inches)Strength (g/tex) Uniformity (%) Loan Value1 (cents/lb.) Return per Acre2 ($/acre) 
NG 2982 B3XF1,447 a29.67 a-d2.52 cd1.13 cd29.27 ab82.043.58 a-d453 a
DG 3317 B3XF1,305 ab34.04 a2.89 a-c1.08 f28.00 bc81.445.58 a481 a
DG 3385 B2XF1,301 ab31.58 ab3.12 a1.09 ef27.43 cd80.944.87 ab507 a
NG 3729 B2XF1,267 ab30.06 a-c2.94 ab1.16 ab27.77 b-d81.137.08 de480 a
DP 1820 B3XF1,156 bc30.75 a-c2.91 a-c1.19 a30.63 a80.735.70 e429 a
NG 3930 B3XF1,139 bc28.78 b-d2.74 a-d1.15 bc27.70 b-d81.938.15 b-e410 a
DP 2020 B3XF994 c26.14 cd2.57 b-d1.12 cd25.13 e79.644.45 a-c262 b
DP 2012 B3XF968 cd24.82 d2.54 b-d1.11 de26.00 de80.242.90 a-d275 b
ST 4990 B3XF790 de25.82 cd2.40 d1.16 b27.93 bc80.236.82 de206 b
ST 5610 B3XF742 e25.88 cd2.37 d1.12 d27.73 b-d80.137.60 c-e203 b
         
Average1,11128.752.701.1327.7680.8140.67371
p-value<0.00010.01670.0120<0.00010.00050.10940.0396<0.0001
pLSD 204 4.99 0.41 0.03 1.8 NS3 7.19 126
CV22.7413.5711.773.156.151.3912.7935.79

1Color and leaf grades set to base levels (41 and 4, respectively) due to lack of proper lint cleaner on gin.
2Return per acre calculated as (lint yield per acre X loan value per pound) - seed cost per acre.
3NS; no significant statistical difference between varieties at p-value <0.1.

Table 11. 2020 Tillman Co. Dryland RACE Trial.
Planted: June 2
Seeding Rate: 25,000 40-inch row spacing
Harvested: Nov. 19, stripper harvested

 
Variety Lint Yield (lbs./acre)  Turnout (%)  Micronaire Length (inches)Strength (g/tex)  Uniformity (%) Loan Value1 (cents/lb.) Return per Acre2
($/acre)
NG 4098 B3XF990 a36.23 ab4.13 a-c1.21 a32.7 a81.854.23 a489 a
DP 2020 B3XF932 ab34.86 b-d3.95 bc1.15 bc28.1 d82.353.65 b456 ab
NG 3930 B3XF926 ab33.39 de4.06 bc1.15 bc29.9 b-d82.653.80 b458 ab
ST 5707 B2XF898 ab34.17 c-e4.33 ab1.11 d31.9 ab82.553.78 b449 ab
ST 5600 B2XF885 b37.24 a4.50 a1.13 cd29.8 b-d82.353.63 b432 ab
DP 1646 B2XF872 b36.08 ab3.82 c1.21 a29.5 cd82.053.80 b424 b
DP 1948 B3XF862 b35.08 bc3.82 c1.21 a31.2 a-c83.054.27 a425 b
NG 4936 B3XF746 c32.82 e3.99 bc1.17 b29.3 cd83.053.95 ab359 c
NG 5711 B3XF711 c34.16 c-e3.83 c1.15 bc28.7 d82.053.73 b339 c
         
Average86934.894.051.1730.1182.453.87426
p-value0.00070.00020.0358<0.00010.00570.65150.00480.0009
pLSD1041.480.430.032.16NS30.3357
CV11.464.587.633.205.941.170.5112.69

1Color and leaf grades set to base levels (41 and 4, respectively) due to lack of proper lint cleaner on gin.
2Return per acre calculated as (lint yield per acre X loan value per pound) - seed cost per acre.
3NS; no significant statistical difference between varieties at p-value <0.1.

Table 12. 2020 Tillman Co. Irrigated RACE Trial.
Planted: June 1
Seeding Rate: 40,000 40-inch row spacing
Irrigation: center pivot
Harvested: Nov. 20, picker harvested

 
Variety Lint Yield (lbs./acre)  Turnout (%) Micronaire Length (inches)Strength (g/tex) Uniformity (%) Loan Value1 (cents/lb.) Return per Acre2 ($/acre)
DP 1948 B3XF102139.68 a4.27 bc1.2133.2 b82.954.85492
ST 5707 B2XF101436.80 b4.36 b1.1935.7 a85.054.40498
NG 3930 B3XF99440.28 a4.37 b1.1529.0 c82.754.23475
NG 5711 B3XF97539.44 a4.18 bc1.1930.8 c82.854.38461
DP 2020 B3XF95936.73 b3.81 c1.2129.6 c83.454.28449
NG 4098 B3XF95737.17 b3.94 bc1.2434.3 ab83.254.32443
NG 4936 B3XF93936.99 b4.18 bc1.2129.4 c84.154.43443
ST 5600 B2XF91739.00 a4.94 a1.1833.1 b84.253.47422
         
Average97238.264.251.2031.983.554.30460
p-value0.5960.0020.00950.1038<0.00010.27280.24540.3427
pLSDNS3 1.180.49NS2.0NSNSNS
CV7.014.339.422.878.151.501.149.15

1Color and leaf grades set to base levels (41 and 4, respectively) due to lack of proper lint cleaner on gin.
2Return per acre calculated as (lint yield per acre X loan value per pound) - seed cost per acre.
3NS; no significant statistical difference between varieties at p-value <0.1.

Table 13. 2020 Washita Co. Dryland RACE Trial.
Planted: June 2
Seeding Rate: 30,000 40-inch row spacing
Harvested: Nov. 11, stripper harvested

 
VarietyLint Yield (lbs./acre)  Turnout (%)MicronaireLength (inches)Strength (g/tex)Uniformity (%)Loan Value1 (cents/lb.)  Return per Acre2 ($/acre)
NG 4098 B3XF789 a36.65 a4.92 cd1.15 a32.9 a81.453.23 a363 a
DP 2044 B3XF746 ab36.49 a4.76 de1.15 a31.6 a81.553.08 a358 a
ST 5600 B2XF715 a-c36.87 a5.36 a1.10 bc29.8 b82.648.95 cd299 b
ST 5707 B2XF676 bc34.11 bc5.41 a1.12 abc32.9 a82.750.37 b-d300 b
NG 3930 B3XF675 bc36.54 a5.03 bc1.09 bc28.9 bc82.751.17 a-c298 b
NG 5711 B3XF651 cd36.75 a4.89 c-e1.08 c29.5 bc81.052.57 ab290 bc
NG 3729 B2XF634 c-e36.79 a5.25 ab1.08 c27.2 d81.448.33 d258 b-d
DP 2012 B3XF583 de35.33 ab4.70 de1.09 bc28.1 cd81.951.93 ab248 cd
NG 4936 B3XF577 de32.47 c4.72 de1.13 ab29.7 b83.652.95 a255 b-d
DP 2020 B3XF552 e34.73 ab4.65 e1.09 bc28.1 cd81.952.92 a239 d
         
Average66035.674.971.1128.8882.0751.55239 d
p-value0.00040.0066<0.00010.0143<0.00010.16060.00130.0003
pLSD 90 2.23 0.260.051.5 NS32.3249
CV13.425.046.853.246.911.424.2517.53

1Color and leaf grades set to base levels (41 and 4, respectively) due to lack of proper lint cleaner on gin.
2Return per acre calculated as (lint yield per acre X loan value per pound) - seed cost per acre.
3NS; no significant statistical difference between varieties at p-value <0.1.

Seth Byrd
Cotton Extension Specialist

Andrea Althoff
Graduate Research Assistant

Aaron Henson
Extension Educator, Tillman County

Greg Hartman
Extension Educator, Washita and Beckham counties

Gary Strickland
Extension Educator, Greer and Jackson counties and Dryland Cropping Systems Specialist

Bradley Wilson
Graduate Research Assistant

Jerry Goodson
Extension Assistant, IPM

Josh Bushong
Area Agronomist

Danny Cook
Extension Educator, Roger Mills County

Cayden Catlin
Graduate Research Assistant

Cameron Murley
Superintendent, OPREC

Brian Pugh
Area Agronomist and District Program Leader

Cody Linker
Extension Educator, Lincoln County

Was this information helpful?
YES NO
Fact Sheet
Understanding ThryvOn Cotton Technology

Learn how the technology works, when scouting is still needed and how it supports integrated pest management in Oklahoma cotton production.

CropsCottonInsects Pests And DiseasesPesticides
VIEW ALL